Home/Case Law/Ninth Circuit/Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,084 Murray Zucker, and Salomon Brothers Inc. Montgomery Securities v. Maxicare Health Plans Inc. Fred W. Wasserman Pamela K. Anderson AKA Pamela Wasserman, Murray Zucker on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, and Maxicare Health Plans Inc. Fred Wasserman Pamela K. Anderson AKA Pamela K. Wasserman David M. Hallis Samuel L. Westover Gerald Zaid Charles W. Smith, III Randall Anderson Howard Freedland James A. McIntyre Alan Bloom Charles E. Lewis Peter J. Ratican v. Ernst & Young, Successor-In-Interest to Ernst & Whinney, Objector-Appellant
FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 660719
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,084 Murray Zucker, and Salomon Brothers Inc. Montgomery Securities v. Maxicare Health Plans Inc. Fred W. Wasserman Pamela K. Anderson AKA Pamela Wasserman, Murray Zucker on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, and Maxicare Health Plans Inc. Fred Wasserman Pamela K. Anderson AKA Pamela K. Wasserman David M. Hallis Samuel L. Westover Gerald Zaid Charles W. Smith, III Randall Anderson Howard Freedland James A. McIntyre Alan Bloom Charles E. Lewis Peter J. Ratican v. Ernst & Young, Successor-In-Interest to Ernst & Whinney, Objector-Appellant
No. 660719 · Decided January 26, 1994
No. 660719·Ninth Circuit · 1994·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
January 26, 1994
Citation
No. 660719
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
Plain English Summary
Plain-English summary coming soon. Read the opinion text below for the current holding.
Key Points
01
02
03
04
Frequently Asked Questions
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,084 Murray Zucker, and Salomon Brothers Inc. Montgomery Securities v. Maxicare Health Plans Inc. Fred W. Wasserman Pamela K. Anderson AKA Pamela Wasserman, Murray Zucker on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, and Maxicare Health Plans Inc. Fred Wasserman Pamela K. Anderson AKA Pamela K. Wasserman David M. Hallis Samuel L. Westover Gerald Zaid Charles W. Smith, III Randall Anderson Howard Freedland James A. McIntyre Alan Bloom Charles E. Lewis Peter J. Ratican v. Ernst & Young, Successor-In-Interest to Ernst & Whinney, Objector-Appellant is a decision of the Ninth Circuit. Review the opinion text below for the holding.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,084 Murray Zucker, and Salomon Brothers Inc. Montgomery Securities v. Maxicare Health Plans Inc. Fred W. Wasserman Pamela K. Anderson AKA Pamela Wasserman, Murray Zucker on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, and Maxicare Health Plans Inc. Fred Wasserman Pamela K. Anderson AKA Pamela K. Wasserman David M. Hallis Samuel L. Westover Gerald Zaid Charles W. Smith, III Randall Anderson Howard Freedland James A. McIntyre Alan Bloom Charles E. Lewis Peter J. Ratican v. Ernst & Young, Successor-In-Interest to Ernst & Whinney, Objector-Appellant in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on January 26, 1994.
Use the citation No. 660719 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.