Home/Case Law/Ninth Circuit/Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,436 Susan C. Semegen v. Stephen M. Weidner, and Robert Alexander, Alexander & Rosenberg, David B. Winder, and Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., Susan C. Semegen v. Stephen M. Weidner, and Jan Mirsky and Daniel Topper
FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 462699
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,436 Susan C. Semegen v. Stephen M. Weidner, and Robert Alexander, Alexander & Rosenberg, David B. Winder, and Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., Susan C. Semegen v. Stephen M. Weidner, and Jan Mirsky and Daniel Topper
No. 462699 · Decided January 16, 1986
No. 462699·Ninth Circuit · 1986·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
January 16, 1986
Citation
No. 462699
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
Plain English Summary
Plain-English summary coming soon. Read the opinion text below for the current holding.
Key Points
01
02
03
04
Frequently Asked Questions
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,436 Susan C. Semegen v. Stephen M. Weidner, and Robert Alexander, Alexander & Rosenberg, David B. Winder, and Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., Susan C. Semegen v. Stephen M. Weidner, and Jan Mirsky and Daniel Topper is a decision of the Ninth Circuit. Review the opinion text below for the holding.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,436 Susan C. Semegen v. Stephen M. Weidner, and Robert Alexander, Alexander & Rosenberg, David B. Winder, and Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., Susan C. Semegen v. Stephen M. Weidner, and Jan Mirsky and Daniel Topper in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on January 16, 1986.
Use the citation No. 462699 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.