Home/ Case Law/ Ninth Circuit/ Excess Ins. Co., Ltd., Phoenix Assur. Co., Ltd., Phoenix Assur. Co., British Aviation Ins. Co., Ltd., Threadneedle Ins. Co., Ltd., Trident Ins. Co., Ltd., Scottish Lion Ins. Co., Ltd., Mentor Ins. Co., Ltd., Per Mentor Underwriting Agents (Uk), Ltd., London & Hull Maritime Ins. Co., Ltd., Bishopgate Ins. Co., Ltd., River Thames Ins. Co., Ltd., River Trans. & Gen. Ins. Co., Ltd., Ulter Marine Ins. Co., Ltd., Andrew Weir Ins. Co., Provintial Ins. Co. Ltd., British Law
FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 547186
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Excess Ins. Co., Ltd., Phoenix Assur. Co., Ltd., Phoenix Assur. Co., British Aviation Ins. Co., Ltd., Threadneedle Ins. Co., Ltd., Trident Ins. Co., Ltd., Scottish Lion Ins. Co., Ltd., Mentor Ins. Co., Ltd., Per Mentor Underwriting Agents (Uk), Ltd., London & Hull Maritime Ins. Co., Ltd., Bishopgate Ins. Co., Ltd., River Thames Ins. Co., Ltd., River Trans. & Gen. Ins. Co., Ltd., Ulter Marine Ins. Co., Ltd., Andrew Weir Ins. Co., Provintial Ins. Co. Ltd., British Law

No. 547186 · Decided August 30, 1990
No. 547186 · Ninth Circuit · 1990 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
August 30, 1990
Citation
No. 547186
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
Plain English Summary
Plain-English summary coming soon. Read the opinion text below for the current holding.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
Excess Ins. Co., Ltd., Phoenix Assur. Co., Ltd., Phoenix Assur. Co., British Aviation Ins. Co., Ltd., Threadneedle Ins. Co., Ltd., Trident Ins. Co., Ltd., Scottish Lion Ins. Co., Ltd., Mentor Ins. Co., Ltd., Per Mentor Underwriting Agents (Uk), Ltd., London & Hull Maritime Ins. Co., Ltd., Bishopgate Ins. Co., Ltd., River Thames Ins. Co., Ltd., River Trans. & Gen. Ins. Co., Ltd., Ulter Marine Ins. Co., Ltd., Andrew Weir Ins. Co., Provintial Ins. Co. Ltd., British Law is a decision of the Ninth Circuit. Review the opinion text below for the holding.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Excess Ins. Co., Ltd., Phoenix Assur. Co., Ltd., Phoenix Assur. Co., British Aviation Ins. Co., Ltd., Threadneedle Ins. Co., Ltd., Trident Ins. Co., Ltd., Scottish Lion Ins. Co., Ltd., Mentor Ins. Co., Ltd., Per Mentor Underwriting Agents (Uk), Ltd., London & Hull Maritime Ins. Co., Ltd., Bishopgate Ins. Co., Ltd., River Thames Ins. Co., Ltd., River Trans. & Gen. Ins. Co., Ltd., Ulter Marine Ins. Co., Ltd., Andrew Weir Ins. Co., Provintial Ins. Co. Ltd., British Law in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on August 30, 1990.
Use the citation No. 547186 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases
1990
Steven M. De Long v. Michael Hennessey, Steven M. De Lo
1990
Carson Wayne Newton, Aka: Wayne Newton v. National Broa
1990
Coopers & Lybrand v. Sun-Diamond Growers of Ca Sun-Maid
Ninth Circuit
All Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →