Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8699813
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Estate of Sauceda v. City of North Las Vegas
No. 8699813 · Decided July 11, 2017
No. 8699813·Ninth Circuit · 2017·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
July 11, 2017
Citation
No. 8699813
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
ORDER ** The district court’s summary judgment orders are VACATED and the case is REMANDED to the district court so that the court can consider the summary judgment issues in light of County of Los Angeles v. Mendez, — U.S. -, 137 S.Ct. 1539 , 198 L.Ed.2d 52 (2017). Each party shall bear its own costs on appeal. VACATED and REMANDED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3,
Plain English Summary
ORDER ** The district court’s summary judgment orders are VACATED and the case is REMANDED to the district court so that the court can consider the summary judgment issues in light of County of Los Angeles v.
Key Points
01ORDER ** The district court’s summary judgment orders are VACATED and the case is REMANDED to the district court so that the court can consider the summary judgment issues in light of County of Los Angeles v.
02This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3,
03
04
Frequently Asked Questions
ORDER ** The district court’s summary judgment orders are VACATED and the case is REMANDED to the district court so that the court can consider the summary judgment issues in light of County of Los Angeles v.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Estate of Sauceda v. City of North Las Vegas in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on July 11, 2017.
Use the citation No. 8699813 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.