Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8692933
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Eruchalu v. U.S. Bank
No. 8692933 · Decided July 29, 2014
No. 8692933·Ninth Circuit · 2014·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
July 29, 2014
Citation
No. 8692933
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Plaintiff Godson Eruchalu appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his request for preliminary injunctive relief. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (a)(1), and we affirm. Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying preliminary injunctive relief, and we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion. Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 24 , 129 S.Ct. 365 , 172 L.Ed.2d 249 (2008) (listing factors for district court to consider); Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press Int’l, 686 F.2d 750, 752-53 (9th Cir.1982) (explaining limited scope of review). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Plaintiff Godson Eruchalu appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his request for preliminary injunctive relief.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Plaintiff Godson Eruchalu appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his request for preliminary injunctive relief.
02Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying preliminary injunctive relief, and we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion.
03365 , 172 L.Ed.2d 249 (2008) (listing factors for district court to consider); Sports Form, Inc.