FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10708928
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Emery v. Gitness

No. 10708928 · Decided October 22, 2025
No. 10708928 · Ninth Circuit · 2025 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
October 22, 2025
Citation
No. 10708928
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 22 2025 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ROBERT L. EMERY, JR., No. 24-5344 D.C. No. 2:23-cv-01958-MC Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MEMORANDUM* GABRIELL GITNESS, BHS Health Services Assistant Administrator; CHRISTY HUTSON, Behavioral Health Services (BHS) Assistant Administrator; ELIZABETH COLEMAN, Mental Health Specialist; ERIN REYES, Superintendent, Two Rivers Correctional Institution (TRCI); K. BOLSON, Corporal, TRCI; MARK NOOTH, Institutions Administrator, Oregon Department of Corrections (ODOC); MARLENE AGUIAR, BHS Counselor, TRCI; JOSEPH BUGHER, Health Services Assistant Director (ODOC); Sgt. ROBERTS, Security, TRCI; Lt. HAZEN, Security; Corporal FARELY; C/O PHILLIPS, Correctional Officer at TRCI; JOHN AND JANE DOES, ODOC/TRCI Staff and or Contractors; CARA PETERSON, ODOC/TRCI BHS Staff, Defendants - Appellees. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael J. McShane, District Judge, Presiding Submitted October 15, 2025** Before: FRIEDLAND, MILLER, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges. Oregon state prisoner Robert L. Emery, Jr., appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional violations arising during his incarceration. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm. Because Emery fails to address the district court’s grounds for dismissal in his opening brief, we do not consider his challenge to the district court’s order. See Indep. Towers of Wash. v. Washington, 350 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir. 2003) (“[W]e will not consider any claims that were not actually argued in appellant’s opening brief.”). Emery’s motion (Docket Entry No. 9) to expedite the appeal is denied as moot. AFFIRMED. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 2 24-5344
Plain English Summary
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 22 2025 MOLLY C.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 22 2025 MOLLY C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Emery v. Gitness in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on October 22, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10708928 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →