Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10708928
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Emery v. Gitness
No. 10708928 · Decided October 22, 2025
No. 10708928·Ninth Circuit · 2025·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
October 22, 2025
Citation
No. 10708928
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 22 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ROBERT L. EMERY, JR., No. 24-5344
D.C. No. 2:23-cv-01958-MC
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. MEMORANDUM*
GABRIELL GITNESS, BHS Health
Services Assistant
Administrator; CHRISTY HUTSON,
Behavioral Health Services (BHS) Assistant
Administrator; ELIZABETH COLEMAN,
Mental Health Specialist; ERIN REYES,
Superintendent, Two Rivers Correctional
Institution (TRCI); K. BOLSON, Corporal,
TRCI; MARK NOOTH, Institutions
Administrator, Oregon Department of
Corrections (ODOC); MARLENE
AGUIAR, BHS Counselor, TRCI; JOSEPH
BUGHER, Health Services Assistant
Director (ODOC); Sgt. ROBERTS,
Security, TRCI; Lt. HAZEN,
Security; Corporal FARELY; C/O
PHILLIPS, Correctional Officer at
TRCI; JOHN AND JANE DOES,
ODOC/TRCI Staff and or
Contractors; CARA PETERSON,
ODOC/TRCI BHS Staff,
Defendants - Appellees.
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Oregon
Michael J. McShane, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 15, 2025**
Before: FRIEDLAND, MILLER, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.
Oregon state prisoner Robert L. Emery, Jr., appeals pro se from the district
court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional
violations arising during his incarceration. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291. We affirm.
Because Emery fails to address the district court’s grounds for dismissal in
his opening brief, we do not consider his challenge to the district court’s order. See
Indep. Towers of Wash. v. Washington, 350 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir. 2003) (“[W]e
will not consider any claims that were not actually argued in appellant’s opening
brief.”).
Emery’s motion (Docket Entry No. 9) to expedite the appeal is denied as
moot.
AFFIRMED.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
2 24-5344
Plain English Summary
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 22 2025 MOLLY C.
Key Points
01NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 22 2025 MOLLY C.
02MEMORANDUM* GABRIELL GITNESS, BHS Health Services Assistant Administrator; CHRISTY HUTSON, Behavioral Health Services (BHS) Assistant Administrator; ELIZABETH COLEMAN, Mental Health Specialist; ERIN REYES, Superintendent, Two Rivers Correct
03BOLSON, Corporal, TRCI; MARK NOOTH, Institutions Administrator, Oregon Department of Corrections (ODOC); MARLENE AGUIAR, BHS Counselor, TRCI; JOSEPH BUGHER, Health Services Assistant Director (ODOC); Sgt.
04HAZEN, Security; Corporal FARELY; C/O PHILLIPS, Correctional Officer at TRCI; JOHN AND JANE DOES, ODOC/TRCI Staff and or Contractors; CARA PETERSON, ODOC/TRCI BHS Staff, Defendants - Appellees.
Frequently Asked Questions
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 22 2025 MOLLY C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Emery v. Gitness in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on October 22, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10708928 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.