Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8624176
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Elias v. Dominguez ex rel. Hemp
No. 8624176 · Decided August 11, 2006
No. 8624176·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
August 11, 2006
Citation
No. 8624176
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** A review of the record and the opening brief indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment. *634 All pending motions are denied as moot. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** A review of the record and the opening brief indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** A review of the record and the opening brief indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
03Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment.
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** A review of the record and the opening brief indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Elias v. Dominguez ex rel. Hemp in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on August 11, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8624176 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.