FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8648270
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Eleazar v. Mukasey

No. 8648270 · Decided March 11, 2008
No. 8648270 · Ninth Circuit · 2008 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
March 11, 2008
Citation
No. 8648270
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Emmanuel Guerrero Eleazar, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision pretermitting his application for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review. We lack jurisdiction to review Eleazar’s contention that the IJ violated his due process rights by not allowing his wife to testify, and by concluding Eleazar lacked the requisite good moral character because he gave false testimony to an immigration interviewer. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004) (explaining that this court lacks jurisdiction to review procedural due process claims not raised before the agency). PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Emmanuel Guerrero Eleazar, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision pretermitting his app
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Emmanuel Guerrero Eleazar, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision pretermitting his app
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Eleazar v. Mukasey in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on March 11, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8648270 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →