Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8644496
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Duenas v. Keisler
No. 8644496 · Decided October 10, 2007
No. 8644496·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
October 10, 2007
Citation
No. 8644496
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM *** This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order de *792 nying petitioner’s sixth motion to reconsider. The regulations provide that motions to reconsider shall be limited to one motion in any case previously the subject of a final decision by the BIA. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (b)(2). Because petitioner filed his sixth motion to reconsider, the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reconsider for exceeding numerical limitations. Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied. All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c), shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM *** This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order de *792 nying petitioner’s sixth motion to reconsider.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM *** This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order de *792 nying petitioner’s sixth motion to reconsider.
02The regulations provide that motions to reconsider shall be limited to one motion in any case previously the subject of a final decision by the BIA.
03Because petitioner filed his sixth motion to reconsider, the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reconsider for exceeding numerical limitations.
04Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM *** This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order de *792 nying petitioner’s sixth motion to reconsider.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Duenas v. Keisler in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on October 10, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8644496 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.