Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8867455
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Drake v. Paulhamus
No. 8867455 · Decided June 24, 1895
No. 8867455·Ninth Circuit · 1895·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
June 24, 1895
Citation
No. 8867455
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
PER CURIAM. In the petition for rehearing it is urged that the court overlooked the distinction between an assignment directly to *329 creditors, and one in trust for creditors. The distinction was not overlooked. 30 there was a trust: created between Paulhamus and ilie creditors, whose assignee he was, it was not created by Lindsay, the debtor. Lockhart v. Stevenson, 61 Pa. St. 64. The rehearing is therefore denied.
Plain English Summary
In the petition for rehearing it is urged that the court overlooked the distinction between an assignment directly to *329 creditors, and one in trust for creditors.
Key Points
01In the petition for rehearing it is urged that the court overlooked the distinction between an assignment directly to *329 creditors, and one in trust for creditors.
0230 there was a trust: created between Paulhamus and ilie creditors, whose assignee he was, it was not created by Lindsay, the debtor.
03
04
Frequently Asked Questions
In the petition for rehearing it is urged that the court overlooked the distinction between an assignment directly to *329 creditors, and one in trust for creditors.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Drake v. Paulhamus in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on June 24, 1895.
Use the citation No. 8867455 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.