Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8630639
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Diego-Rodriguez v. Gonzales
No. 8630639 · Decided April 25, 2007
No. 8630639·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
April 25, 2007
Citation
No. 8630639
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Jose Luis Diego-Rodríguez and Enriqueta Ramirez-Flores, natives and citizens of Mexico, seek review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) *582 denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003). We deny the petition for review. The BIA considered the evidence petitioners submitted with their motion to reopen and acted within its broad discretion in determining that the evidence was insufficient to warrant reopening. See Singh v. INS, 295 F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir.2002) (the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen shall be reversed if it is “arbitrary, irrational, or contrary to law”). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Jose Luis Diego-Rodríguez and Enriqueta Ramirez-Flores, natives and citizens of Mexico, seek review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) *582 denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Jose Luis Diego-Rodríguez and Enriqueta Ramirez-Flores, natives and citizens of Mexico, seek review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) *582 denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings.
02We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen.
03The BIA considered the evidence petitioners submitted with their motion to reopen and acted within its broad discretion in determining that the evidence was insufficient to warrant reopening.
04INS, 295 F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir.2002) (the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen shall be reversed if it is “arbitrary, irrational, or contrary to law”).
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Jose Luis Diego-Rodríguez and Enriqueta Ramirez-Flores, natives and citizens of Mexico, seek review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) *582 denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Diego-Rodriguez v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on April 25, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8630639 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.