FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8689375
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Desai v. Mukasey

No. 8689375 · Decided September 23, 2008
No. 8689375 · Ninth Circuit · 2008 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
September 23, 2008
Citation
No. 8689375
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
*323 MEMORANDUM ** In these consolidated petitions, Jayanti-bhai Desai, a native and citizen of India, and Indiraben Patel, a native of Tanzania and citizen of the United Kingdom, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s removal orders, No. 05-74854, and of the BIA order denying their motion to reopen, No. 06-75073. We deny petition No. 05-74854 and dismiss petition No. 06-75073. In Jayantibhai v. Gonzales, No. 04-74607 (9th Cir. Feb 15, 2005) (order), the court dismissed for lack of jurisdiction a petition for review of the BIA order dismissing petitioners’ appeal. We do not revisit that determination. We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision not to invoke its sua sponte authority to reopen proceedings under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (a). See Toufighi v. Mukasey, 538 F.3d 988 , 993 n. 8 (9th Cir.2008) (mandate pending). No. 05-74584 PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED; No. 06-75073 PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
*323 MEMORANDUM ** In these consolidated petitions, Jayanti-bhai Desai, a native and citizen of India, and Indiraben Patel, a native of Tanzania and citizen of the United Kingdom, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“B
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
*323 MEMORANDUM ** In these consolidated petitions, Jayanti-bhai Desai, a native and citizen of India, and Indiraben Patel, a native of Tanzania and citizen of the United Kingdom, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“B
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Desai v. Mukasey in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on September 23, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8689375 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →