FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8697163
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Deacon v. Pandora Media, Inc.

No. 8697163 · Decided July 21, 2016
No. 8697163 · Ninth Circuit · 2016 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
July 21, 2016
Citation
No. 8697163
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
ORDER ** On February 24, 2015, we certified a question to the Michigan Supreme Court, *582 which it modified and answered on July 6, 2016. In view of the Court’s answer, which dispositively resolves-this case, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provid *582 ed by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Plain English Summary
ORDER ** On February 24, 2015, we certified a question to the Michigan Supreme Court, *582 which it modified and answered on July 6, 2016.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
ORDER ** On February 24, 2015, we certified a question to the Michigan Supreme Court, *582 which it modified and answered on July 6, 2016.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Deacon v. Pandora Media, Inc. in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on July 21, 2016.
Use the citation No. 8697163 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →