Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8648327
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
De La Paz-Pagasa v. Mukasey
No. 8648327 · Decided March 12, 2008
No. 8648327·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
March 12, 2008
Citation
No. 8648327
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Juana De La Paz-Pagasa, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision granting the government’s motion to terminate her removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence the agency’s continuous physical presence determination. See Ibarra-Flores v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 614, 618 (9th Cir.2006). We deny the petition for review. Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that De La Paz-Pagasa did not meet the continuous physical presence requirement due to her two outstanding expedited removal orders. See Juarez-Ramos v. Gonzales, 485 F.3d 509, 512 (9th Cir.2007) (holding that an expedited removal order interrupts an alien’s continuous physical presence for purposes of cancellation of removal). De La Paz-Pagasa’s equal protection contention is unavailing. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Juana De La Paz-Pagasa, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision granting the government’s motion
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Juana De La Paz-Pagasa, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision granting the government’s motion
02We review for substantial evidence the agency’s continuous physical presence determination.
03Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that De La Paz-Pagasa did not meet the continuous physical presence requirement due to her two outstanding expedited removal orders.
04Gonzales, 485 F.3d 509, 512 (9th Cir.2007) (holding that an expedited removal order interrupts an alien’s continuous physical presence for purposes of cancellation of removal).
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Juana De La Paz-Pagasa, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision granting the government’s motion
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for De La Paz-Pagasa v. Mukasey in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on March 12, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8648327 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.