FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8629066
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

De Anda Garcia v. Gonzales

No. 8629066 · Decided February 27, 2007
No. 8629066 · Ninth Circuit · 2007 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
February 27, 2007
Citation
No. 8629066
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Eustolia De Anda Garcia, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reconsider its order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review the denial of a motion to reconsider for abuse of discretion. Membreno v. Gonzales, 425 F.3d 1227, 1229 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny the petition for review. The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying De Anda Garcia’s motion to reconsider as untimely. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (b)(2) (“A motion to reconsider a decision must be filed with the Board within 30 days after the mailing of the Board decision”) (emphasis added). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Eustolia De Anda Garcia, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reconsider its order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s deci
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Eustolia De Anda Garcia, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reconsider its order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s deci
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for De Anda Garcia v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on February 27, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8629066 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →