FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8641699
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Danesh v. Gonzales

No. 8641699 · Decided June 18, 2007
No. 8641699 · Ninth Circuit · 2007 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
June 18, 2007
Citation
No. 8641699
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM * Nastaran Danesh, a native and citizen of Iran, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and withholding under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT withholding”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 , and we deny the petition for review. Because the parties are familiar with the factual and procedural history of this case, we need not recount it here. We deny Danesh’s petition with respect to her claim that she is entitled to asylum. Danesh failed to file an application for asylum within one year of her arrival in the United States, see 8 C.F.R. § 208.4 (a)(2)(ii), and has not demonstrated circumstances excusing her failure to timely file for asylum. See 8 C.F.R. § 208.4 (a)(4)-(5). We deny Danesh’s petition with respect to her claims that she is entitled to withholding of removal and CAT withholding. Danesh testified before the Immigration Judge that although she was exploring Christianity, she did not adhere to any religion. The record does not, therefore, support the conclusion that she converted to Christianity, which is the ground on which she alleges she will be persecuted or tortured. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM * Nastaran Danesh, a native and citizen of Iran, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and withholding under the Convention Against Tortu
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM * Nastaran Danesh, a native and citizen of Iran, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and withholding under the Convention Against Tortu
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Danesh v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on June 18, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8641699 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →