Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8689097
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Dai Nguyen v. Mukasey
No. 8689097 · Decided September 11, 2008
No. 8689097·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
September 11, 2008
Citation
No. 8689097
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Dai Nguyen, a native and citizen of Vietnam, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 , and deny the petition for review. We agree with the BIA that the IJ found Nguyen to be removable on both charges contained in the Notice to Appear. The IJ’s decision found Nguyen “removable as charged” and stated that Nguyen chose not “to present any testimony or evidence with regard to the grounds of removability.” (Emphasis added.) As Nguyen does not argue that he was incorrectly found to be removable under 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (a)(2)(A)(i)(II), we need not address his other charged ground of inadmissibility, 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (a)(2)(C). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Dai Nguyen, a native and citizen of Vietnam, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) removal order.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Dai Nguyen, a native and citizen of Vietnam, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) removal order.
02We agree with the BIA that the IJ found Nguyen to be removable on both charges contained in the Notice to Appear.
03The IJ’s decision found Nguyen “removable as charged” and stated that Nguyen chose not “to present any testimony or evidence with regard to the grounds of removability.” (Emphasis added.) As Nguyen does not argue that he was incorrectly fou
04§ 1182 (a)(2)(A)(i)(II), we need not address his other charged ground of inadmissibility, 8 U.S.C.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Dai Nguyen, a native and citizen of Vietnam, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) removal order.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Dai Nguyen v. Mukasey in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on September 11, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8689097 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.