FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8630846
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Cuevas-Contreras v. Gonzales

No. 8630846 · Decided April 27, 2007
No. 8630846 · Ninth Circuit · 2007 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
April 27, 2007
Citation
No. 8630846
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Jorge Luis Cuevas-Contreras and Myrna Patricia Jimenez Gutierrez, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 and we review for abuse of discretion. See Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003). We deny the petition for review. The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ untimely motion to reopen. As the BIA noted, even applying equitable tolling the motion was filed nine months out of time. See Fajardo v. INS, 300 F.3d 1018 (9th Cir.2002) (statute of limitation for motion to reopen may be equitable tolled until the alien becomes aware of the previous counsel’s error). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Jorge Luis Cuevas-Contreras and Myrna Patricia Jimenez Gutierrez, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Jorge Luis Cuevas-Contreras and Myrna Patricia Jimenez Gutierrez, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Cuevas-Contreras v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on April 27, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8630846 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →