FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8898667
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Cross v. Board of Supervisors

No. 8898667 · Decided April 23, 1971
No. 8898667 · Ninth Circuit · 1971 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
April 23, 1971
Citation
No. 8898667
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
PER CURIAM: After careful consideration of the arguments and authorities cited by appellant, we are satisfied that the action was properly dismissed for the reasons stated in the district court’s thorough opinion. See 326 F.Supp. 634 (N.D.Calif. 1968). The judgment is affirmed.
Plain English Summary
PER CURIAM: After careful consideration of the arguments and authorities cited by appellant, we are satisfied that the action was properly dismissed for the reasons stated in the district court’s thorough opinion.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
PER CURIAM: After careful consideration of the arguments and authorities cited by appellant, we are satisfied that the action was properly dismissed for the reasons stated in the district court’s thorough opinion.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Cross v. Board of Supervisors in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on April 23, 1971.
Use the citation No. 8898667 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →