Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8669444
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Cristobal-Alonzo v. Mukasey
No. 8669444 · Decided April 23, 2008
No. 8669444·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
April 23, 2008
Citation
No. 8669444
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) November 8, 2007 order dismissing petitioner’s appeal of the Immigration Judge’s November 17, 2006 decision. Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Specifically, a review of the record reflects that petitioner conceded removability and did not file any applications for relief. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.31 (c) (directing that opportunity to file any application is deemed waived when application is not filed within time set by Immigration Judge). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied. All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) November 8, 2007 order dismissing petitioner’s appeal of the Immigration Judge’s November 17, 2006 decision.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) November 8, 2007 order dismissing petitioner’s appeal of the Immigration Judge’s November 17, 2006 decision.
02Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
04Specifically, a review of the record reflects that petitioner conceded removability and did not file any applications for relief.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) November 8, 2007 order dismissing petitioner’s appeal of the Immigration Judge’s November 17, 2006 decision.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Cristobal-Alonzo v. Mukasey in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on April 23, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8669444 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.