FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8814453
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Cresta v. Maxwell

No. 8814453 · Decided March 27, 1916
No. 8814453 · Ninth Circuit · 1916 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
March 27, 1916
Citation
No. 8814453
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
ROSS, Circuit Judge. This is a petition for revision under and by virtue of subdivision “b” of section 24 of the Bankruptcy Act of July 1, 1898, giving to the several Circuit Courts of Appeal— “jurisdiction in equity, either interlocutory or final, to superintend and revise in matter of law the proceedings of the several inferior courts of bankruptcy within their jurisdiction. Such power shall be exercised on due notice and petition by any party aggrieved.” The proceedings in the court below so sought to be revised were had in the matter of parties adjudged to be bankrupts under and by virtue of the Bankruptcy Law approved March 2, 1867, and the money claimed by the petitioner is a portion of two dividends declared in the course of the administration of that bankrupt estate, one for $252, and the other for $78.75, for which respective dividends checks were drawn by the assignees of the estate in favor of the creditor of record in thd proceedings, one Tomaso Cresta, and which checks were paid by the bank having custody of the bankrupt estate; the petitioner contending, however, to the wrong persons, Cresta being then dead. *449 We are precluded from deciding or considering the points made in argument on behalf of the petitioner, for the reason that this court is without any jurisdiction in the matter. The Act of Congress of June 7, 1878, c. 160 (20 Stat p. 99), in repealing the Bankruptcy Law of 1867 and its amended and supplemental act, expressly provided: “That such repeal shall in no manner invalidate or affect any case in bankruptcy instituted and pending in any court prior to the day when this act shall take effect; but as to all such pending cases and all future proceedings therein, and in respect of all pains, penalties, and forfeitures which shall have been incurred under any of said acts prior to the day when this act takes effect, or which may be thereafter incurred, under any of those provisions of any of said acts which, for the purposes named in this act, are kept in force, and all penal actions and criminal proceedings for a violation of any of said acts, whether then pending or thereafter instituted, and in respect of all rights of debtors and creditors (except the right of commencing original proceedings in bankruptcy), and all rights of, and suits by, or against assignees, under any, or all of said acts, in any matter or case which shall have arisen prior, to the day when this act takes effect (which shall be on the first day of September, Anno Domini eighteen hundred and seventy-eight), or in any matter or case which shall arise after this act takes effect, in respect of any matter of bankruptcy authorized by this act to be proceeded with after said last-named day, the acts hereby repealed shall continue in full force and effect until the same shall be fully disposed of, in the same manner as if said acts had not been repealed.” The petition for revision is dismissed, at petitioner’s cost.
Plain English Summary
This is a petition for revision under and by virtue of subdivision “b” of section 24 of the Bankruptcy Act of July 1, 1898, giving to the several Circuit Courts of Appeal— “jurisdiction in equity, either interlocutory or final, to superinte
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
This is a petition for revision under and by virtue of subdivision “b” of section 24 of the Bankruptcy Act of July 1, 1898, giving to the several Circuit Courts of Appeal— “jurisdiction in equity, either interlocutory or final, to superinte
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Cresta v. Maxwell in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on March 27, 1916.
Use the citation No. 8814453 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →