Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8623004
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Corte v. Gonzales
No. 8623004 · Decided July 21, 2006
No. 8623004·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
July 21, 2006
Citation
No. 8623004
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard); see also Falcon Carñche v. Ashcroft, 350 F.3d 845 (9th Cir. 2003); Jimenez-Angeles v. Ashcroft, 291 F.3d 594, 602-03 (9th Cir.2002). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied. All other pending motions are denied as moot. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
02Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard); see also Falcon Carñche v.
03This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.
04
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Corte v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on July 21, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8623004 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.