Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8626450
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Cornejo-Verdugo v. Gonzales
No. 8626450 · Decided December 1, 2006
No. 8626450·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
December 1, 2006
Citation
No. 8626450
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam). We review non-discretionary eligibility determinations for relief from removal in immigration proceedings de novo. See Montero-Martinez v. Ashcroft, 277 F.3d 1137, 1145 (9th Cir. 2002). We agree that petitioner’s convictions render him ineligible for adjustment of status. See 8 U.S.C. § 1255 (a); Cardenas-Uriarte v. INS, 227 F.3d 1132, 1136 (9th Cir.2000). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied. All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal remains in effect until issuance of the mandate. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
02We review non-discretionary eligibility determinations for relief from removal in immigration proceedings de novo.
03We agree that petitioner’s convictions render him ineligible for adjustment of status.
04The temporary stay of removal remains in effect until issuance of the mandate.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Cornejo-Verdugo v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on December 1, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8626450 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.