Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 9505370
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Continuing Life Communities Thousand Oaks, LLC v. Cir
No. 9505370 · Decided May 20, 2024
No. 9505370·Ninth Circuit · 2024·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
May 20, 2024
Citation
No. 9505370
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 20 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CONTINUING LIFE COMMUNITIES No. 22-70225
THOUSAND OAKS, LLC, Spieker CLC,
LLC, Tax Matters Partner, IRS No. 4806-15
Petitioner-Appellee,
MEMORANDUM*
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL
REVENUE,
Respondent-Appellant.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
United States Tax Court
Argued and Submitted March 25, 2024
San Francisco, California
Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
The Commissioner of Internal Revenue (“Commissioner”) appeals the tax
court’s grant of summary judgment to Continuing Life Communities Thousand
Oaks, LLC (“CLC”).
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
We have jurisdiction under 26 U.S.C. § 7482(a)(1). We review de novo the
tax court’s grant of summary judgment. Miller v. Commissioner, 310 F.3d 640,
642 (9th Cir. 2002). Where the Commissioner exercises his authority under 26
U.S.C. § 446 to impose an alternative accounting method on a taxpayer, we
independently review the Commissioner’s decision for abuse of discretion. Jim
Turin & Sons, Inc. v. Commissioner, 219 F.3d 1103, 1105 (9th Cir. 2000); Thor
Power Tool Co. v. Commissioner, 439 U.S. 522, 532–37 (1979). We affirm.
Although § 446 grants the Commissioner “wide discretion” to determine
whether a taxpayer’s accounting method clearly reflects income, such discretion
“is not unbridled and may not be arbitrary.” Thor Power Tool, 439 U.S. at 532–33.
Thus, the Commissioner “cannot require a taxpayer to change from an accounting
method which clearly reflects income because the Commissioner considers an
alternate method to more clearly reflect income.” RLC Indus. Co. & Subsidiaries
v. Commissioner, 98 T.C. 457, 491 (1992), aff’d, 58 F.3d 413 (9th Cir. 1995).
It is undisputed that CLC’s accounting method for deferred entrance fees,
which CLC has employed consistently, complies with generally accepted
accounting principles (“GAAP”). Under the applicable regulations, such an
accounting method will ordinarily clearly reflect income. 26 C.F.R. § 1.446-
1(a)(2) (“A method of accounting which reflects the consistent application of
[GAAP] in a particular trade or business . . . will ordinarily be regarded as clearly
2
reflecting income . . . .”).
The Commissioner argues that CLC’s accounting method for deferred
entrance fees nevertheless fails to comply with applicable regulations governing
accrual-method accounting. See Thor Power Tool, 439 U.S. at 533 (holding that
Commissioner did not abuse his discretion in determining that taxpayer’s
consistently-applied, GAAP-compliant accounting method did not clearly reflect
income where that method “was plainly inconsistent with” applicable regulations).
“Under an accrual method of accounting, income is includible in gross income
when all the events have occurred which fix the right to receive such income and
the amount thereof can be determined with reasonable accuracy (all events test).”
26 C.F.R.§ 1.451-1(a). “The objective is to determine at what point in time the
[taxpayer] acquired an unconditional right to receive payment under the contract.”
Hallmark Cards, Inc. & Subsidiaries v. Commissioner, 90 T.C. 26, 32 (1988).
We agree with the tax court that CLC’s accounting method for deferred
entrance fees satisfies the all-events test. While the schedule in the Residence
Agreement sets the fee amount, CLC’s right to receive any deferred entrance fee
from a resident becomes fixed only once CLC fulfills its statutory and contractual
obligation to provide lifetime care to that resident. CLC’s provision of lifetime
care is thus properly understood as a condition precedent, not a condition
subsequent, to its right to receive any deferred entrance fee.
3
Because CLC’s accounting method for deferred entrance fees clearly reflects
income and is consistent with regulatory requirements, the Commissioner lacks
authority to impose an alternative method he considers to more clearly reflect
income. RLC Indus., 98 T.C. at 491.
AFFIRMED.
4
Plain English Summary
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 20 2024 MOLLY C.
Key Points
01NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 20 2024 MOLLY C.
02COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CONTINUING LIFE COMMUNITIES No.
04On Petition for Review of an Order of the United States Tax Court Argued and Submitted March 25, 2024 San Francisco, California Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
Frequently Asked Questions
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 20 2024 MOLLY C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Continuing Life Communities Thousand Oaks, LLC v. Cir in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on May 20, 2024.
Use the citation No. 9505370 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.