FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 9371034
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Constitution Association, Inc. v. Kamala Harris

No. 9371034 · Decided January 26, 2023
No. 9371034 · Ninth Circuit · 2023 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
January 26, 2023
Citation
No. 9371034
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 26 2023 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CONSTITUTION ASSOCIATION, INC., by No. 21-56287 its founders; GEORGE F.X. ROMBACH, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-02379-TWR- Plaintiffs-Appellants, BLM and MEMORANDUM* B. GREEN; et al., Plaintiffs, v. KAMALA D. HARRIS, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Todd W. Robinson, District Judge, Presiding Submitted January 18, 2023** Before: GRABER, PAEZ, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges. George F.X. Rombach and Constitution Association, Inc. appeal from the * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). district court’s judgment dismissing their action challenging Kamala Harris’s eligibility to serve as Vice President. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Carolina Cas. Ins. Co. v. Team Equip., Inc., 741 F.3d 1082, 1086 (9th Cir. 2014). We affirm. The district court properly dismissed plaintiffs’ action because plaintiffs lacked standing. See Drake v. Obama, 664 F.3d 774, 782 (9th Cir. 2011) (dismissing a voter’s claim that President Obama was ineligible for the office because the plaintiff asserted nothing “more than a generalized interest of all citizens in constitutional governance” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)); see also Am. Diabetes Ass’n v. United States Dep’t of the Army, 938 F.3d 1147, 1154-55 (9th Cir. 2019) (setting forth the requirements to establish organizational standing). We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009). AFFIRMED. 2 21-56287
Plain English Summary
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 26 2023 MOLLY C.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 26 2023 MOLLY C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Constitution Association, Inc. v. Kamala Harris in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on January 26, 2023.
Use the citation No. 9371034 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →