Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8631167
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Colin v. Gonzales
No. 8631167 · Decided May 14, 2007
No. 8631167·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
May 14, 2007
Citation
No. 8631167
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review from the denial of petitioner’s second motion to reconsider a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order of removal. *757 The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioner’s second motion to reconsider as numerically barred. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (b)(2); Lara-Torres v. Ashcroft, 383 F.3d 968, 972 (9th Cir.2004). Accordingly, respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982). Petitioner’s motion for a stay of voluntary departure is denied because the stay motion was filed after expiration of the voluntary departure period. See Garcia v. Ashcroft, 368 F.3d 1157, 1159 (9th Cir. 2004). All other pending motions are denied as moot. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review from the denial of petitioner’s second motion to reconsider a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order of removal.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review from the denial of petitioner’s second motion to reconsider a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order of removal.
02*757 The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioner’s second motion to reconsider as numerically barred.
03Accordingly, respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
04Petitioner’s motion for a stay of voluntary departure is denied because the stay motion was filed after expiration of the voluntary departure period.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review from the denial of petitioner’s second motion to reconsider a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order of removal.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Colin v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on May 14, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8631167 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.