Question 1

What did the Ninth Circuit decide in City of Anaheim, City of Riverside, City of Banning, City of Colton, City of Azusa v. Southern California Edison Company?

Accepted Answer

City of Anaheim, City of Riverside, City of Banning, City of Colton, City of Azusa v. Southern California Edison Company is a decision of the Ninth Circuit. Review the opinion text below for the holding.

Question 2

Is City of Anaheim, City of Riverside, City of Banning, City of Colton, City of Azusa v. Southern California Edison Company still good law?

Accepted Answer

FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for City of Anaheim, City of Riverside, City of Banning, City of Colton, City of Azusa v. Southern California Edison Company in the current circuit citation data.

Question 3

When was City of Anaheim, City of Riverside, City of Banning, City of Colton, City of Azusa v. Southern California Edison Company decided?

Accepted Answer

This case was decided on February 7, 1992.

Question 4

How do I cite City of Anaheim, City of Riverside, City of Banning, City of Colton, City of Azusa v. Southern California Edison Company?

Accepted Answer

Use the citation No. 577173 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.

Feature	FlawFinder	Westlaw	LexisNexis
Monthly price	$19 – $99	$133 – $646	$153 – $399
Contract	None	1–3 year min	1–6 year min
Hidden fees	$0, always	Up to $469/search	$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citator	Included	KeyCite ($$$)	Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summary	Included	No	No
Cancel	One click	Termination fees	Account friction

City of Anaheim, City of Riverside, City of Banning, City of Colton, City of Azusa v. Southern California Edison Company

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Full legal research for $19/month