Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10794997
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Citalli Sanchez Escobar v. Pamela Bondi
No. 10794997 · Decided February 17, 2026
No. 10794997·Ninth Circuit · 2026·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
February 17, 2026
Citation
No. 10794997
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 17 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CITLALLI BERENICE SANCHEZ No. 19-71421
ESCOBAR,
Agency No. A096-349-930
Petitioner,
v. MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 12, 2026**
Pasadena, California
Before: TALLMAN, VANDYKE, and TUNG, Circuit Judges.
Citlalli Berenice Sanchez Escobar, a citizen and native of Mexico, petitions
for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) denial of her motion to
reopen as untimely. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review the
BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion, Bonilla v. Lynch, 840
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
F.3d 575, 581 (9th Cir. 2016), and we deny the petition.
We assume without deciding that Sanchez Escobar was ignorant of her
original counsel’s shortcomings until she received her full case file and reviewed it
with current counsel. See id. at 582 (setting forth factors to consider). However,
she did nothing to pursue immigration relief after being approved for deferred
action in 2012 until she retained current counsel in 2017 to assist her in filing an I-
130 petition based on her marriage to a United States citizen—whom she married
in 2010. Neither the record nor the briefs explain this five-year lapse in her efforts
to secure immigration relief. Accordingly, she did not “make reasonable efforts to
pursue relief” during the period from 2012 to 2017 “and so did not demonstrate the
diligence necessary for equitable tolling.” Id. at 583 (citation modified) (finding
equitable tolling not warranted when petitioner waited six years to pursue
immigration relief, purportedly on advice of counsel).
PETITION DENIED.
2
Plain English Summary
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 17 2026 MOLLY C.
Key Points
01NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 17 2026 MOLLY C.
02COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CITLALLI BERENICE SANCHEZ No.
03On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted February 12, 2026** Pasadena, California Before: TALLMAN, VANDYKE, and TUNG, Circuit Judges.
04Citlalli Berenice Sanchez Escobar, a citizen and native of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) denial of her motion to reopen as untimely.
Frequently Asked Questions
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 17 2026 MOLLY C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Citalli Sanchez Escobar v. Pamela Bondi in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on February 17, 2026.
Use the citation No. 10794997 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.