FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 9391831
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Cindy Mendoza v. Kris Strickler

No. 9391831 · Decided April 17, 2023
No. 9391831 · Ninth Circuit · 2023 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
April 17, 2023
Citation
No. 9391831
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CINDY MENDOZA; GLORIA No. 19-35506 BERMUDEZ; REBECCA HEATH; KARL WADE ROBERTS; CEKAIS D.C. No. 3:18-cv- TONI GANUELAS; LORI SPANO, 01634-HZ Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ORDER KRIS STRICKLER, in his official capacity as Director of the Oregon Department of Transportation; AMY JOYCE, in her official capacity as Administrator of the Division of Motor Vehicles, Oregon Department of Transportation, Defendants-Appellees. Filed April 17, 2023 Before: Marsha S. Berzon and Daniel P. Collins, Circuit Judges, and Jennifer Choe-Groves, * Judge. * The Honorable Jennifer Choe-Groves, Judge for the United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation. 2 MENDOZA V. STRICKLER SUMMARY ** Civil Rights The panel denied on behalf of the court a petition for rehearing en banc in an action challenging the constitutionality of Oregon’s since-repealed system of suspending, without an inquiry into ability to pay, the driver’s licenses of persons who fail to pay the fines imposed on them in connection with traffic violations. ** This summary constitutes no part of the opinion of the court. It has been prepared by court staff for the convenience of the reader. MENDOZA V. STRICKLER 3 ORDER The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc, and the matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. See FED. R. APP. P. 35(a). Judge H.A. Thomas did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case. The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.
Plain English Summary
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CINDY MENDOZA; GLORIA No.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CINDY MENDOZA; GLORIA No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Cindy Mendoza v. Kris Strickler in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on April 17, 2023.
Use the citation No. 9391831 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →