Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8693636
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Christopherson v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
No. 8693636 · Decided February 12, 2015
No. 8693636·Ninth Circuit · 2015·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
February 12, 2015
Citation
No. 8693636
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM *** Appellant Jennifer J. Christopherson (Christopherson) appeals the district court’s remand to the Administrative Law Judge of her social security disability benefits application for further proceedings rather than an immediate award of benefits. Reviewing for an abuse of discretion, see Treichler v. Comm’r of Social Security Admin., No. 12-85944, 775 F.3d 1090, 1097-98 , 2014 WL 7332774, at *5 (9th Cir. Dec. 24, 2014), we affirm. Because there are unanswered questions about the extent of Christopherson’s impairment, and divergent opinions on Chris-topherson’s ability to work, the district court did not abuse its discretion in remanding the case for further proceedings. See id. at 1105 , 2014 WL 7332774 at *11 (articulating that a case involving unresolved factual conflicts and ambiguities should be remanded for further proceedings). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent D.C. No. 2:09-cv-01005-JAT except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
Christopherson (Christopherson) appeals the district court’s remand to the Administrative Law Judge of her social security disability benefits application for further proceedings rather than an immediate award of benefits.
Key Points
01Christopherson (Christopherson) appeals the district court’s remand to the Administrative Law Judge of her social security disability benefits application for further proceedings rather than an immediate award of benefits.
03Because there are unanswered questions about the extent of Christopherson’s impairment, and divergent opinions on Chris-topherson’s ability to work, the district court did not abuse its discretion in remanding the case for further proceedin
04at 1105 , 2014 WL 7332774 at *11 (articulating that a case involving unresolved factual conflicts and ambiguities should be remanded for further proceedings).
Frequently Asked Questions
Christopherson (Christopherson) appeals the district court’s remand to the Administrative Law Judge of her social security disability benefits application for further proceedings rather than an immediate award of benefits.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Christopherson v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on February 12, 2015.
Use the citation No. 8693636 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.