Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8813490
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Chan Ngun Yuk v. White
No. 8813490 · Decided January 10, 1916
No. 8813490·Ninth Circuit · 1916·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
January 10, 1916
Citation
No. 8813490
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
Appeals from *1020 the District Court of the United States for the First Division of the Northern District of California. Jno. W. Preston, U. S. Atty., and Casper A. Ornbaum, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee. On motion of counsel for appellees, appeals dismissed for the noncompliance by the appel-. lants with the provisions of subdivision 1 of rule 16 of the Rules of Practice of this court (the, appellant in each ease having failed to file a record thereof and to docket the case by or before the return day required by' said rule).
Plain English Summary
Appeals from *1020 the District Court of the United States for the First Division of the Northern District of California.
Key Points
01Appeals from *1020 the District Court of the United States for the First Division of the Northern District of California.
02On motion of counsel for appellees, appeals dismissed for the noncompliance by the appel-.
03lants with the provisions of subdivision 1 of rule 16 of the Rules of Practice of this court (the, appellant in each ease having failed to file a record thereof and to docket the case by or before the return day required by' said rule).
04
Frequently Asked Questions
Appeals from *1020 the District Court of the United States for the First Division of the Northern District of California.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Chan Ngun Yuk v. White in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on January 10, 1916.
Use the citation No. 8813490 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.