Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8628843
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Castro v. Gonzales
No. 8628843 · Decided February 26, 2007
No. 8628843·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
February 26, 2007
Citation
No. 8628843
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying petitioners’ motion to reconsider. The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to reconsider as untimely. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (b)(2) (stating time limits for filing motions to reconsider); Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 895-96 (9th Cir.2003). Accordingly, respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam). All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying petitioners’ motion to reconsider.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying petitioners’ motion to reconsider.
02The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to reconsider as untimely.
03§ 1003.2 (b)(2) (stating time limits for filing motions to reconsider); Iturribarria v.
04Accordingly, respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying petitioners’ motion to reconsider.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Castro v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on February 26, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8628843 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.