Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8630122
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Castillo v. Gonzales
No. 8630122 · Decided April 20, 2007
No. 8630122·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
April 20, 2007
Citation
No. 8630122
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Heriberto Ambrocio Hernandez Castillo and his wife, Araeeli Lopez-Avalos, seek review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals upholding an immigration judge’s order denying their applications for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review. We lack jurisdiction to review the discretionary determination that petitioners failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying relative. See Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir.2003). Petitioners’ contention that the agency disregarded their evidence of hardship is not supported by the record and does not amount tó a colorable due process claim. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005) (“[Traditional abuse of discretion challenges recast as alleged due process violations do not constitute colorable constitutional claims that would invoke our jurisdiction.”). PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Heriberto Ambrocio Hernandez Castillo and his wife, Araeeli Lopez-Avalos, seek review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals upholding an immigration judge’s order denying their applications for cancellation of remova
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Heriberto Ambrocio Hernandez Castillo and his wife, Araeeli Lopez-Avalos, seek review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals upholding an immigration judge’s order denying their applications for cancellation of remova
02We lack jurisdiction to review the discretionary determination that petitioners failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying relative.
03Petitioners’ contention that the agency disregarded their evidence of hardship is not supported by the record and does not amount tó a colorable due process claim.
04Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005) (“[Traditional abuse of discretion challenges recast as alleged due process violations do not constitute colorable constitutional claims that would invoke our jurisdiction.”).
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Heriberto Ambrocio Hernandez Castillo and his wife, Araeeli Lopez-Avalos, seek review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals upholding an immigration judge’s order denying their applications for cancellation of remova
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Castillo v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on April 20, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8630122 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.