Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8641535
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Carrillo Herrera v. Gonzales
No. 8641535 · Decided June 11, 2007
No. 8641535·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
June 11, 2007
Citation
No. 8641535
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Francisco Carrillo Herrera, Ma Del Rosario Carrillo and their daughter Brenda *532 Patricia Carrillo Leon, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“Board”) denial of their second motion to reopen removal proceedings as numerically-barred. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We deny the petition for review. Petitioners waived any challenge to the Board’s denial of their second motion to reopen by failing to address that decision in their opening brief. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996) (holding that issues which are not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provid *532 ed by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Francisco Carrillo Herrera, Ma Del Rosario Carrillo and their daughter Brenda *532 Patricia Carrillo Leon, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“Board”) denial of the
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Francisco Carrillo Herrera, Ma Del Rosario Carrillo and their daughter Brenda *532 Patricia Carrillo Leon, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“Board”) denial of the
02Petitioners waived any challenge to the Board’s denial of their second motion to reopen by failing to address that decision in their opening brief.
03INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996) (holding that issues which are not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived).
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provid *532 ed by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Francisco Carrillo Herrera, Ma Del Rosario Carrillo and their daughter Brenda *532 Patricia Carrillo Leon, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“Board”) denial of the
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Carrillo Herrera v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on June 11, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8641535 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.