Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8688785
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Carrigan v. Alverson Taylor Mortensen & Sanders
No. 8688785 · Decided August 18, 2008
No. 8688785·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
August 18, 2008
Citation
No. 8688785
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Appellant Debra Carrigan appeals the district court’s judgment dismissing her case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. This court reviews the district court’s order de novo, and we affirm. See Love v. United States, 915 F.2d 1242 (9th Cir. 1990); Gibson v. United States, 781 F.2d 1334,1337 (9th Cir.1986). Our review of the record and of appellant’s response to this court’s order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Appellant Debra Carrigan appeals the district court’s judgment dismissing her case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Appellant Debra Carrigan appeals the district court’s judgment dismissing her case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
02This court reviews the district court’s order de novo, and we affirm.
03Our review of the record and of appellant’s response to this court’s order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.