Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8630625
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Carrera v. Gonzales
No. 8630625 · Decided April 24, 2007
No. 8630625·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
April 24, 2007
Citation
No. 8630625
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Remigio Zepeda Carrera and his wife Maria del Carmen Zepeda, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ summary dismissal of their appeal of an immigration judge’s denial of their applications for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . Petitioners contend that the Board erred in summarily dismissing their appeal pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1 (d)(2)(i)(A) for failure to provide meaningful notice of the specific issues contested, either in their notice of appeal or in a brief. Petitioners argue that they did not have the opportunity to file a brief because they never received a copy of the record of proceedings before the immigration judge. The record does not show that the petitioners informed the Board of their difficulties in obtaining the record. We therefore deny the petition for review. See Singh v. Ashcroft, 361 F.3d 1152, 1157 (9th Cir.2004). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Remigio Zepeda Carrera and his wife Maria del Carmen Zepeda, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ summary dismissal of their appeal of an immigration judge’s denial of
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Remigio Zepeda Carrera and his wife Maria del Carmen Zepeda, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ summary dismissal of their appeal of an immigration judge’s denial of
02Petitioners contend that the Board erred in summarily dismissing their appeal pursuant to 8 C.F.R.
03§ 1003.1 (d)(2)(i)(A) for failure to provide meaningful notice of the specific issues contested, either in their notice of appeal or in a brief.
04Petitioners argue that they did not have the opportunity to file a brief because they never received a copy of the record of proceedings before the immigration judge.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Remigio Zepeda Carrera and his wife Maria del Carmen Zepeda, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ summary dismissal of their appeal of an immigration judge’s denial of
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Carrera v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on April 24, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8630625 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.