FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8630138
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Carrasco-Alegre v. Gonzales

No. 8630138 · Decided April 20, 2007
No. 8630138 · Ninth Circuit · 2007 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
April 20, 2007
Citation
No. 8630138
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Orlando Dimas Carrasco-Alegre, a native and citizen of Peru, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) summary affirmance of the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum and withholding of remov *716 al. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We deny the petition. Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s conclusion that Carrasco-Alegre did not demonstrate past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution. See Prasad v. INS, 47 F.3d 336, 340 (9th Cir. 1995). Accordingly, Carrasco-Alegre is not eligible for asylum. Because Carrasco-Alegre failed to demonstrate eligibility for asylum, it follows ' that he did not satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. See id. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Orlando Dimas Carrasco-Alegre, a native and citizen of Peru, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) summary affirmance of the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum and withh
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Orlando Dimas Carrasco-Alegre, a native and citizen of Peru, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) summary affirmance of the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum and withh
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Carrasco-Alegre v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on April 20, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8630138 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →