Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8623674
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Campo-Diaz v. Gonzales
No. 8623674 · Decided July 31, 2006
No. 8623674·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
July 31, 2006
Citation
No. 8623674
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM *** Pablo Angel Martin Campo-Diaz and Gloria Cedillo-Olivarez, husband and wife *488 and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying their applications for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review. Petitioners’ contention that the IJ violated their due process rights by disregarding and misconstruing their evidence concerning Cedillo-Olivarez’s Type 1 diabetes is not supported by the record and does not amount to a colorable constitutional claim. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005) (“traditional abuse of discretion challenges recast as alleged due process violations do not constitute colorable constitutional claims that would invoke our jurisdiction.”). PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM *** Pablo Angel Martin Campo-Diaz and Gloria Cedillo-Olivarez, husband and wife *488 and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing their appeal from an immigration j
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM *** Pablo Angel Martin Campo-Diaz and Gloria Cedillo-Olivarez, husband and wife *488 and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing their appeal from an immigration j
02Petitioners’ contention that the IJ violated their due process rights by disregarding and misconstruing their evidence concerning Cedillo-Olivarez’s Type 1 diabetes is not supported by the record and does not amount to a colorable constitut
03Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005) (“traditional abuse of discretion challenges recast as alleged due process violations do not constitute colorable constitutional claims that would invoke our jurisdiction.”).
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM *** Pablo Angel Martin Campo-Diaz and Gloria Cedillo-Olivarez, husband and wife *488 and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing their appeal from an immigration j
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Campo-Diaz v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on July 31, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8623674 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.