Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8630888
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Callejas v. Gonzales
No. 8630888 · Decided April 30, 2007
No. 8630888·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
April 30, 2007
Citation
No. 8630888
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Alejandro Misrraim Padrón Callejas and Samanta Jazmín Cruz Davila seek review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) upholding an immigration judge’s order denying their applications for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review. In their opening brief, petitioners’ sole contention is that the BIA violated their due process rights by not accepting their appeal brief. We lack jurisdiction to review petitioners’ contention because they failed to raise it before the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004) (noting that due process challenges that are “procedural in nature” must be exhausted). PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Alejandro Misrraim Padrón Callejas and Samanta Jazmín Cruz Davila seek review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) upholding an immigration judge’s order denying their applications for cancellation of remova
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Alejandro Misrraim Padrón Callejas and Samanta Jazmín Cruz Davila seek review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) upholding an immigration judge’s order denying their applications for cancellation of remova
02In their opening brief, petitioners’ sole contention is that the BIA violated their due process rights by not accepting their appeal brief.
03We lack jurisdiction to review petitioners’ contention because they failed to raise it before the BIA.
04Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004) (noting that due process challenges that are “procedural in nature” must be exhausted).
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Alejandro Misrraim Padrón Callejas and Samanta Jazmín Cruz Davila seek review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) upholding an immigration judge’s order denying their applications for cancellation of remova
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Callejas v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on April 30, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8630888 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.