FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8876401
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

California Redwood Co. v. Litle

No. 8876401 · Decided May 3, 1898
No. 8876401 · Ninth Circuit · 1898 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
May 3, 1898
Citation
No. 8876401
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
HAWLEY, District Judge. This case presents substantially the same questions that were involved in Mortgage Co. v. Hopper, 12 C. C. A. 293 , 64 Fed. 553, 559 . We are asked to review the question relative to the rights of bona fide purchasers, for value, before the issuance of a patent. We adhere to the views expressed upon this point in the Hopper Case, repeated and followed by this court in Diller v. Hawley, 26 C. C. A. 514 , 81 Fed. 651, 655 ; and, upon the principles therein announced, the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed, with costs.
Plain English Summary
This case presents substantially the same questions that were involved in Mortgage Co.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
This case presents substantially the same questions that were involved in Mortgage Co.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for California Redwood Co. v. Litle in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on May 3, 1898.
Use the citation No. 8876401 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →