Home/Case Law/Ninth Circuit/California Dried Fruit Agency v. United States Consol. Seeded Raisin Co.
FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8792783
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
California Dried Fruit Agency v. United States Consol. Seeded Raisin Co.
No. 8792783 · Decided October 17, 1910
No. 8792783·Ninth Circuit · 1910·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
October 17, 1910
Citation
No. 8792783
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
PER CURIAM. On motion of John H. Miller, counsel for the appellee, and it appearing to the court that this cause was submitted to the court for con‘sideration and decision on the briefs filed by counsel in the cause entitled Kings County Raisin & Fruit Co., Appellant, v. U. S. Consolidated Seeded Raisin Co. (No. 1,835 here) 182 Fed. 59 , in which latter "case an opinion of this court was filed, and a decree was filed and entered on October 3, 1910, affirming the order of the court below, ordered, decree of the court below herein affirmed, with costs in favor of the appellee and against the appellants, and that a decree be filed and entered herein accordingly.
Plain English Summary
Miller, counsel for the appellee, and it appearing to the court that this cause was submitted to the court for con‘sideration and decision on the briefs filed by counsel in the cause entitled Kings County Raisin & Fruit Co., Appellant,
Key Points
01Miller, counsel for the appellee, and it appearing to the court that this cause was submitted to the court for con‘sideration and decision on the briefs filed by counsel in the cause entitled Kings County Raisin & Fruit Co., Appellant,
0259 , in which latter "case an opinion of this court was filed, and a decree was filed and entered on October 3, 1910, affirming the order of the court below, ordered, decree of the court below herein affirmed, with costs in favor of the app
03
04
Frequently Asked Questions
Miller, counsel for the appellee, and it appearing to the court that this cause was submitted to the court for con‘sideration and decision on the briefs filed by counsel in the cause entitled Kings County Raisin & Fruit Co., Appellant,
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for California Dried Fruit Agency v. United States Consol. Seeded Raisin Co. in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on October 17, 1910.
Use the citation No. 8792783 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.