FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8688941
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Cadena v. Mukasey

No. 8688941 · Decided September 10, 2008
No. 8688941 · Ninth Circuit · 2008 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
September 10, 2008
Citation
No. 8688941
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** *857 Juan Manuel Godinez Cadena, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision ordering him removed and denying his request to administratively close proceedings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review questions of law de novo, Rodriguez-Lariz v. INS, 282 F.3d 1218, 1222 (9th Cir.2002), and we deny the petition. The BIA correctly affirmed the IJ’s denial of petitioner’s request for administrative closure where the government declined to consent to the closure of the case. See In Re Gutierrez-Lopez, 21 I. & N. Dec. 479, 480 (BIA 1996) (“A case may not be administratively closed if opposed by either of the parties”). Petitioner’s requests for decision are denied as moot. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** *857 Juan Manuel Godinez Cadena, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision ordering him removed an
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** *857 Juan Manuel Godinez Cadena, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision ordering him removed an
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Cadena v. Mukasey in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on September 10, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8688941 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →