Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8631155
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Cabrera v. Gonzales
No. 8631155 · Decided May 14, 2007
No. 8631155·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
May 14, 2007
Citation
No. 8631155
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying petitioner’s motion to reconsider. The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying petitioner’s motion to reconsider because the motion failed to identify any errors of fact or law in the BIA’s June 8, 2006 order. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (b)(1); see also Membreno v. Gonzales, 425 F.3d 1227 , 1230 n. 5 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). Moreover, as petitioner acknowledges, this petition for review repeats contentions that were raised and rejected in petition No. 06-73423. No exception to the law of the case doctrine applies here. See Merritt v. Mackey, 932 F.2d 1317, 1320 (9th Cir.1991). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied, and respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). *746 All other pending motions are denied as moot. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying petitioner’s motion to reconsider.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying petitioner’s motion to reconsider.
02The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying petitioner’s motion to reconsider because the motion failed to identify any errors of fact or law in the BIA’s June 8, 2006 order.
03Moreover, as petitioner acknowledges, this petition for review repeats contentions that were raised and rejected in petition No.
04Accordingly, this petition for review is denied, and respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying petitioner’s motion to reconsider.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Cabrera v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on May 14, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8631155 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.