Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 9412700
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Brian Bunton v. Cir
No. 9412700 · Decided July 11, 2023
No. 9412700·Ninth Circuit · 2023·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
July 11, 2023
Citation
No. 9412700
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 11 2023
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BRIAN K. BUNTON; KAREN A. No. 22-70139
BUNTON,
Tax Ct. No. 20438-19L
Petitioners-Appellants,
v. MEMORANDUM*
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL
REVENUE,
Respondent-Appellee.
Appeal from a Decision of the
United States Tax Court
Submitted June 26, 2023**
Before: CANBY, S.R. THOMAS, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
Brian K. Bunton and Karen A. Bunton appeal pro se from the Tax Court’s
decision sustaining a proposed levy to collect unpaid 2016 tax liabilities. We have
jurisdiction under 26 U.S.C. § 7482(a)(1). We review de novo the Tax Court’s
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
conclusions of law and for clear error its factual findings. DJB Holding Corp. v.
Comm’r, 803 F.3d 1014, 1022 (9th Cir. 2015). We affirm.
The Tax Court properly determined that the Buntons were precluded from
challenging their underlying liability because they were deemed to have received
the notices of deficiency, and they failed to raise the issue of liability at a
collection due process (“CDP”) hearing. See 26 U.S.C. § 6330(c)(2)(B) (stating
that taxpayer may challenge underlying tax liability at hearing regarding
subsequent levy “if the [taxpayer] did not receive any statutory notice of deficiency
for such tax liability or did not otherwise have an opportunity to dispute [it]”);
26 C.F.R. § 301.6330-1(f)(2) (stating that Tax Court may consider only issues that
were properly raised and supported with evidence during CDP hearing). The Tax
Court properly deemed the notices received because the proof of certified mailing
to the Buntons’ last known address gives rise to a presumption that they received
the notices. See Baldwin v. United States, 921 F.3d 836, 840 (9th Cir. 2019).
AFFIRMED.
2 22-70139
Plain English Summary
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 11 2023 MOLLY C.
Key Points
01NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 11 2023 MOLLY C.
02MEMORANDUM* COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.
03Bunton appeal pro se from the Tax Court’s decision sustaining a proposed levy to collect unpaid 2016 tax liabilities.
04We review de novo the Tax Court’s * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Frequently Asked Questions
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 11 2023 MOLLY C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Brian Bunton v. Cir in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on July 11, 2023.
Use the citation No. 9412700 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.