Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8645592
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Bonilla v. Mukasey
No. 8645592 · Decided November 26, 2007
No. 8645592·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
November 26, 2007
Citation
No. 8645592
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Alfonso Ramiro Chavez Bonilla petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) order denying petitioner’s fifth motion to reconsider the denial of his application for cancellation of removal. The regulations provide that motions to reconsider shall be limited to one motion in any case previously the subject of a final decision by the BIA. See 8 C.F.R. 1003.2(b)(2). Because petitioner filed his fifth motion to reconsider, the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reconsider for exceeding numerical limitations. We lack jurisdiction to review the Immigration Judge’s discretionary determination that Bonilla failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying relative. See Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 890 (9th Cir.2003). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part, DISMISSED in part. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Alfonso Ramiro Chavez Bonilla petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) order denying petitioner’s fifth motion to reconsider the denial of his application for cancellation of removal.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Alfonso Ramiro Chavez Bonilla petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) order denying petitioner’s fifth motion to reconsider the denial of his application for cancellation of removal.
02The regulations provide that motions to reconsider shall be limited to one motion in any case previously the subject of a final decision by the BIA.
03Because petitioner filed his fifth motion to reconsider, the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reconsider for exceeding numerical limitations.
04We lack jurisdiction to review the Immigration Judge’s discretionary determination that Bonilla failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying relative.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Alfonso Ramiro Chavez Bonilla petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) order denying petitioner’s fifth motion to reconsider the denial of his application for cancellation of removal.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Bonilla v. Mukasey in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on November 26, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8645592 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.