Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8621255
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Bennett v. Monem
No. 8621255 · Decided May 18, 2006
No. 8621255·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
May 18, 2006
Citation
No. 8621255
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Oregon state prisoner Douglas B. Bennett appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his qui tam action as barred by res judicata. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo, Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir.1998) (order), and we affirm. Because Bennett makes no argument on appeal challenging the district court’s June 21, 2005 order dismissing his action, he has waived the right to challenge that order. See Indep. Towers of Washington v. Washington, 350 F.3d 925 , 929 (9th Cir.2003). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
Bennett appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his qui tam action as barred by res judicata.
Key Points
01Bennett appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his qui tam action as barred by res judicata.
02Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir.1998) (order), and we affirm.
03Because Bennett makes no argument on appeal challenging the district court’s June 21, 2005 order dismissing his action, he has waived the right to challenge that order.
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9 th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bennett appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his qui tam action as barred by res judicata.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Bennett v. Monem in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on May 18, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8621255 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.