Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8810201
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Bay v. Merrill & Ring Logging Co.
No. 8810201 · Decided February 1, 1915
No. 8810201·Ninth Circuit · 1915·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
February 1, 1915
Citation
No. 8810201
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
GILBERT, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above). We may assume from the evidence that the defendant in error was a common carrier; but it is clear that it was not engaged in interstate commerce. In that respect the facts in the case are identical with those which were before this court in the recent case of Nordgard v. Marysville & Northern Railway Company, 218 Fed. 737 , 134 C. C. A. 415 , and we need not add to the discussion that was there had. The judgment is affirmed.
ROSS, Circuit Judge. I dissent, for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in the case of Nordgard v. Marysville & Northern Railway Company, above referred to.
Plain English Summary
We may assume from the evidence that the defendant in error was a common carrier; but it is clear that it was not engaged in interstate commerce.
Key Points
01We may assume from the evidence that the defendant in error was a common carrier; but it is clear that it was not engaged in interstate commerce.
02In that respect the facts in the case are identical with those which were before this court in the recent case of Nordgard v.
03415 , and we need not add to the discussion that was there had.
04I dissent, for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in the case of Nordgard v.
Frequently Asked Questions
We may assume from the evidence that the defendant in error was a common carrier; but it is clear that it was not engaged in interstate commerce.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Bay v. Merrill & Ring Logging Co. in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on February 1, 1915.
Use the citation No. 8810201 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.