Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8637653
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Battle v. Sanchez
No. 8637653 · Decided May 21, 2007
No. 8637653·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
May 21, 2007
Citation
No. 8637653
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** The district court properly dismissed Battle’s ADA and court access claims because he failed to raise them in his complaint. 1 Even if the chronology of events is sufficient to permit an inference of retaliation, the inference is rebutted by uncontradicted evidence that the people who took Battle’s property were unaware of the conduct that Battle alleges prompted them to retaliate against him. 2 The district court properly granted summary judgment on Battle’s property deprivation 3 and due process claims. 4 AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. . Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dep’t, 901 F.2d 696, 699 (9th Cir.1988). . Nulph v. Cook, 333 F.3d 1052, 1058 (9th Cir.2003). . See Cal.Code Regs. tit. 15, § 3190(b) (2007). . Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517, 533 , 104 S.Ct. 3194 , 82 L.Ed.2d 393 (1984); Sorrels v. McKee, 290 F.3d 965, 972 (9th Cir.2002).
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** The district court properly dismissed Battle’s ADA and court access claims because he failed to raise them in his complaint.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** The district court properly dismissed Battle’s ADA and court access claims because he failed to raise them in his complaint.
021 Even if the chronology of events is sufficient to permit an inference of retaliation, the inference is rebutted by uncontradicted evidence that the people who took Battle’s property were unaware of the conduct that Battle alleges prompted
032 The district court properly granted summary judgment on Battle’s property deprivation 3 and due process claims.
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** The district court properly dismissed Battle’s ADA and court access claims because he failed to raise them in his complaint.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Battle v. Sanchez in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on May 21, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8637653 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.