Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8674942
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Barron v. Mukasey
No. 8674942 · Decided May 21, 2008
No. 8674942·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
May 21, 2008
Citation
No. 8674942
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Carlos F. Bastidas Barron, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for suspension of deportation. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review the IJ’s continuous physical presence determination for substantial evidence. Vera-Villegas v. INS, 330 F.3d 1222, 1230 (9th Cir.2003). We deny the petition for review. Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s determination that Bastidas Barron did not demonstrate seven years of continuous physical presence where the record contains a Notice and Request for Disposition form, printed in English and Spanish and signed by Bastidas Barron, stating that he was giving up his right to a hearing before an IJ and agreeing to return to Mexico. See Vasquez-Lopez v. Ashcroft, 343 F.3d 961, 974 (9th Cir.2003) (per curiam). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
Bastidas Barron, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for suspension of deportation.
Key Points
01Bastidas Barron, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for suspension of deportation.
02We review the IJ’s continuous physical presence determination for substantial evidence.
03Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s determination that Bastidas Barron did not demonstrate seven years of continuous physical presence where the record contains a Notice and Request for Disposition form, printed in English and Spanish an
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bastidas Barron, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for suspension of deportation.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Barron v. Mukasey in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on May 21, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8674942 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.