FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8689382
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Barongan v. Mukasey

No. 8689382 · Decided September 23, 2008
No. 8689382 · Ninth Circuit · 2008 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
September 23, 2008
Citation
No. 8689382
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** In these consolidated petitions, Medarlo U. Barongan, native and citizen of the Philippines, seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming an immigration judge’s decision denying his motion to continue and denying his motion to remand, No. 05-71257, and the BIA’s order denying his motion to reopen and reconsider, No. 05-72632. We have jurisdiction under by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We deny the petitions for review. In his reply brief, Barongan changes his request for relief because his is not eligible to adjust under 8 U.S.C. § 1255 because of the impending dissolution of his marriage. We decline to reach the merits of his newly raised estoppel argument. See Bazuaye v. INS, 79 F.3d 118,120 (9th Cir.1996) (per curiam) (declining to reach issue raised for the first time in the reply brief). PETITIONS FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
Barongan, native and citizen of the Philippines, seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming an immigration judge’s decision denying his motion to continue and denying his motion to remand, No.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
Barongan, native and citizen of the Philippines, seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming an immigration judge’s decision denying his motion to continue and denying his motion to remand, No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Barongan v. Mukasey in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on September 23, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8689382 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →